|
Performance agreements would additionally be
required annually between the governance partners which defines
measurable goals in key operational areas. This agreement could
identify: dependencies and requirements for each governance partner
to maintain service levels, respective resource commitments, funding
or expenditure flexibilities, and essential reporting and
accountability measures.
 |
|
 |
The
State-County Results Accountability Initiative/New State-County
Governance Model calls for Performance Agreements. Performance
Agreements would be required between the governance partners which
defines measureable goals in key operational areas. This agreement
could identify: dependencies and requirements for each governance
partner to maintain service levels, respective resource commitments,
funding or expenditures flexibilities, and essential reporting and
accountability measures.
In the design of Performance Agreements, the County and the State
have a mutual interest in eliminating administrative rules that are
useless and burdensome as it relates to producing results.
Similarly, they might also be able to identify procedural laws or
regulatory processes that act as needless impediments to
performance. Finally, they have a mutual interest in advancing state
mandate reforms that are barriers to high performance and results.
The Legislature desires to empower Counties regarding the
administration and operational functions of the human services
system and adhere to its role of policy making and strategic
decision making. The County needs greater local control and
flexibilities and therefore has to have granted waivers or variances
from the regulatory agencies or state legislature. The State has an
interest in effectively increasing accountability, decreasing cost,
and increasing efficiencies and effectiveness in exchange for
granting these flexibilities or freedoms. The performance agency is
uncoupled from select administrative rules, procedural laws,
regulatory processes or legislative mandates but more tightly bound
to the regulatory agency in regards to a performance agreement.
Whether spending is a critical factor for performance outcomes has
everything to do with whether a County is expending funds on the
right services, for the right people, at the right time, in the
right manner according to Evidence Based Practices. A new charter or
governance agreement could grant a waiver for the County to flexibly
target funding and resources toward a comprehensive continuum of
effective human services within a system of care. |
|
Local Control
+
Funding Flexibility
+
Mandate Relief
+
Administrative Simplification
+
Performance Accountability
=
A
Redesigned Human Services System in Minnesota |
|
|
 |
 |
|