|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
April
3, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Capital Investment
Bill Passes House and Senate On
Wednesday, April 2, both the House and Senate passed the Omnibus Capital
Investment Bill (HF 380). The House passed the bill 90-42 and the
Senate passed the bill 57-10. The
bill approved by the conference committee is $100 million higher than the
governor has recommended for general obligation bonding authority.
Accordingly, there was much discussion on the level of debt service during
debate in both bodies. Opponents raised concerns about how exceeding
the cap would affect the state’s bond ratings and deviate from decades of
policy agreement, while supporters provided arguments that the level of
debt service would remain within the established 3% limit over
time. A
specific provision was put in the bill to reassure the governor of the
legislature’s intent not to exceed the 3% cap. The bill states that
in calculating the debt service limits using the Department of Finance’s
guidelines, the department must assume that the bonding amount in future
odd-numbered years will be at the same amount assumed in the budget
forecast and assume a bonding amount in future even-numbered years will be
an amount that will allow general fund debt service payments to meet the
guidelines. House
and Senate authors also emphasized that the higher level of investment in
this bill would put more people to work in the short run, provide more
jobs for the future and hedge against future inflationary
pressures. State
Finance Commissioner Hanson reminded conference committee members on April
1 that the governor has made it clear that he wants to keep the bill at
his $825 million recommendation. It is unclear whether the governor
will exercise his line-item veto authority or simply veto the entire bill
to achieve this spending limit. The chart
below highlights the major line item investments in transportation and
economic development.
Metro counties
vote on sales tax With
authorization provided for in the 2008 Transportation Funding bill, five
metro counties voted to impose a levy of an additional ¼ percent in the
state sales tax that will enable a new joint powers board to expand light
rail, commuter rail and busway systems throughout the metropolitan area.
Anoka, Ramsey, Dakota, Hennepin,
and Washington voted to impose this new levy. Carver and Scott
decided not participate at this time but will still participate in the
planning process established by the new joint powers board.
For
more information, contact:
Carol Lovro, AMC Policy Analyst
*ADMINISTRATORS
/AUDITORS: Please share a hard copy of all AMC UPDATE emails with
any county board members who do not have email. **If
you do not wish to receive these emails in the future, please reply to
this message with the word ‘REMOVE’ in the subject line. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Association
of Minnesota Counties 125
Charles Avenue Saint
Paul, MN 55103-2108 Phone:
651.224.3344, Fax: 651.224.6540 |